Since 2007, our team has assisted hundreds of public organizations and entities with community, ballot measure, and public policy surveys. The following is information about some of our successful survey research projects. Just click on one of the blue buttons below to view a survey category.
The 2025 City and County of Broomfield Community Survey gathered responses from 2,908 residents and found strong overall satisfaction with quality of life and city services. Most residents (83%) rated Broomfield as an excellent or good place to live, with similarly high ratings for quality of life, parks, open space, and recreational amenities. Public safety and community events were key factors contributing to residents’ positive perceptions.
However, satisfaction with city government performance, particularly city council, has declined since previous surveys. Residents expressed concerns about the rising cost of living, lack of affordable housing, and increasing utility rates. The need for a vibrant, walkable town center and better traffic management also emerged as common priorities. Residents want the city to focus on financial sustainability, affordable housing, accessible transportation, and maintaining a welcoming and inclusive community.
The 2025 community survey for Denver City Council District 4 reveals that residents’ top concerns center on crime and public safety (48%), followed by homelessness (43%) and affordable housing (33%). Most respondents feel the city is heading in the wrong direction (60%) and disapprove of the City Council’s performance (53%), though they view their District 4 Councilmember more favorably (46% approve). Residents strongly support increased police presence (73%) and stricter enforcement of quality-of-life ordinances (70%), while also backing investments in mental health services (64%) and affordable housing (55%).
When it comes to specific policy measures, survey participants show strong support for addressing retail theft (79% support), establishing stricter penalties for gun possession by prohibited persons (76%), and creating more permanent supportive housing (67%). Residents are more divided on proposals such as creating safe outdoor spaces for the unhoused (49% support, 45% oppose) and converting hotels to supportive housing (53% support, 41% oppose). Demographically, the survey respondents were predominantly homeowners (78%), with a significant portion being long-term residents of 10 years or more (64%), and skewing older, with 57% aged 55 or above.
Mesa County residents expressed overall satisfaction with their community in the 2024 survey, with 82% rating it as an excellent or good place to live. While residents value the area’s natural beauty, small-town feel, and outdoor recreation opportunities, they identified several key concerns. Housing affordability emerged as the most pressing issue (43% rated it poor), followed by homelessness, public transportation, and employment opportunities. Additionally, many expressed dissatisfaction with road maintenance and the flow of traffic.
The survey revealed mixed opinions about county services, with emergency services receiving high marks while services for vulnerable populations scored lower. Respondents demonstrated strong support for addressing mental health, with 85% backing increased funding for mental health services. Communication preferences showed residents primarily rely on social media (55%) and the county website (46%) for information. Overall, while residents appreciate Mesa County’s quality of life, they clearly desire improvements in affordable housing, infrastructure maintenance, and social services.
The 2023 City of Manitou Springs Community Survey gathered feedback from 515 adult residents to assess quality of life, satisfaction with city services, and community priorities. Most residents gave positive ratings for neighborhood livability (89%), the city as a place to live (85%), and overall quality of life (85%). Parks, trails, recreational amenities, and emergency services also received high satisfaction levels. However, areas like traffic flow, housing availability, affordability of groceries, and childcare access were rated poorly. While the community strongly supports emergency services, parks, and infrastructure as top budget priorities, there is frustration with parking, mobility, and street repairs. Many residents feel the city focuses more on tourists than residents, with 58% saying the city prioritizes tourism.
The survey also explored land use, public safety, city communications, and community identity. Water conservation, historic preservation, and affordable housing emerged as key land-use priorities. Public safety services, particularly fire and emergency response, received strong approval, but there are concerns about police presence, enforcement, and response times. Only 53% of residents believe the city incorporates public input into decisions, with many relying on word of mouth and the city’s website for information. Residents emphasized the importance of fiscal responsibility, community safety, affordable housing, and vibrant cultural spaces. Despite challenges with traffic, housing, and city communication, residents generally value the community’s quality of life and unique character.
The City of Lafayette Ballot Measure Survey collected input from 788 residents regarding two potential tax measures to fund capital improvements, including upgrades to the Bob Burger Recreation Center, construction of a new Civic Center, and renovation of the Parks/Public Works Service Center. The survey found 79% approval of the city’s overall performance, and 67% of residents believed the city is heading in the right direction. Initially, 53% of respondents supported a property tax increase to fund the projects, and 56% supported a sales tax increase. After learning more about the aging facilities, their maintenance challenges, and the proposed improvements, support for both options increased to 57% for the property tax and 58% for the sales tax. Respondents identified facility upgrades, particularly at the recreation center, as a high priority to enhance quality of life, modernize services, and address capacity issues.
Voters expressed mixed preferences on funding methods, with some favoring property taxes as a fairer option and others preferring sales taxes to distribute the burden more evenly across all consumers. Many respondents felt that the city’s proposed investments would help maintain Lafayette’s character and competitiveness while supporting growth. However, concerns remained about affordability, tax fatigue, and whether all three projects should be bundled into a single measure. Some voters favored prioritizing the recreation center and delaying or scaling back other projects. There were calls for more transparent spending, phased improvements, and alternative funding sources. Despite concerns, the survey showed broad interest in improving community facilities and a willingness to consider reasonable tax increases if funds are spent responsibly.
The Larimer County Transportation Survey collected feedback from 3,567 residents regarding their transportation needs and funding priorities in unincorporated areas of the county. Just over half of respondents (53%) approved of the county’s management of transportation systems, but many residents identified a need for significant improvements. Key priorities included enhancing bicycle infrastructure, improving road maintenance and safety, expanding public transportation options, improving traffic flow, and increasing pedestrian safety. Most residents emphasized that improving road safety, increasing maintenance, and reducing congestion were top priorities, with 79% saying traffic congestion is increasing and 42% believing road safety is decreasing. Residents were divided on whether the county has sufficient financial resources, with only 53% believing the county can adequately fund transportation needs.
The survey also tested public support for a potential 0.15% sales tax increase dedicated to transportation, which would not apply to groceries and would expire after 15 years. Initially, 61% of respondents supported the measure, and support increased to 64% after learning more about the county’s funding gaps, the role of visitor spending, and the potential to leverage additional grant funding. Many voters viewed the tax as a reasonable, shared solution to address infrastructure needs, but concerns persisted about high existing taxes, government spending efficiency, and rising living costs. When presented with an alternative 0.25% sales tax increase to fund broader regional improvements, support decreased to 47%. Overall, the survey revealed strong community interest in improving transportation infrastructure; however, tax fatigue, economic pressures, and concerns about government trust were significant factors shaping voter attitudes.
The City of Evans Ballot Measure Survey gathered input from 379 voters to gauge opinions on a potential property tax increase to fund public safety, infrastructure maintenance, community beautification, and economic development. Initial support for the proposed 11.964-mill property tax increase was low, with just 35% in favor and 47% opposed. However, support increased to 46% after respondents were presented with detailed financial and historical context about the city’s revenue structure, past tax rates, and the limited share of property taxes the city currently collects. Many residents expressed concerns about the city’s heavy reliance on sales tax revenue, which is seen as unstable in times of economic downturns. The survey also found that 71% of voters approved of the city’s overall performance, but only 56% agreed the city is fiscally responsible.
Residents identified several key community concerns, including deteriorating roads, high water and utility costs, public safety, and rising costs of living. Supporters of the ballot measure emphasized the need for improved services, better infrastructure, and the importance of investing in the city’s future. They noted that Evans’ property tax burden is relatively low compared to surrounding areas and saw the proposed tax as a reasonable way to maintain services. Opponents were primarily concerned about affordability, government spending transparency, and preferred that the city focus on attracting new businesses rather than increasing taxes. Many also questioned the size of the proposed tax increase and called for more detailed plans and financial accountability before supporting it.
The 2025 City of Centennial Voter Opinion Survey collected input from 1,170 registered voters to assess satisfaction with city services, financial management, public safety, transportation, and potential funding strategies. Overall, 59% of voters approved of the city’s performance, and 56% said they received good value for their taxes and fees. A majority of respondents (69%) believed the city has enough financial resources to maintain services, and 54% agreed the city is fiscally responsible. Public safety emerged as a key issue, with 63% of respondents approving of the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office partnership, although 37% felt that crime had increased in recent years. Voters also expressed strong concern about traffic congestion, with 83% saying traffic has worsened and 42% believing road safety has declined.
Residents were split on whether they would support a tax increase to fund street improvements (50% support, 46% oppose) or to support the public safety contract (48% support, 46% oppose). However, support grew after voters were presented with information about the city’s low sales tax rate, rising infrastructure costs, and limited transportation funding. After reviewing the city’s financial challenges, 62% supported a modest tax increase for transportation, and 53% supported an increase for public safety. Supporters emphasized the need to address road maintenance, inflation, public safety, and preserving the city’s high quality of life. Opponents raised concerns about the existing tax burden, government spending priorities, and the level of satisfaction with current service levels. Some residents also expressed that public safety already consumes too much of the city’s budget, while others prioritized public safety over transportation investments.
The Greeley-Evans School District 6 Community Survey gathered responses from 723 residents to assess public opinion on the district’s performance, financial management, and key priorities. Overall, 53% of respondents had a favorable opinion of the district, and 51% approved of its performance educating students. Teachers received stronger ratings, with 57% viewing them favorably. However, opinions were divided on whether the district has adequate financial resources and if it spends taxpayer money wisely. Residents were also split on whether the district is headed in the right direction (48% right direction, 37% wrong track). Supporters pointed to strong leadership, caring teachers, measurable student gains, expanded programs, and investment in modern facilities. Critics raised concerns about low academic performance, politicized classroom content, uneven distribution of resources, teacher burnout, and classroom discipline issues.
When asked about budget priorities, residents identified career and technical education, attracting and retaining high-quality teachers, and core academic instruction as top spending areas. Modern facilities and sports programs were ranked as lower priorities. Among parents, 73% supported the district’s recent cell phone restrictions, but opinions were mixed on whether students receive adequate mental health support. Communication from schools was generally rated as good, with text messaging being the preferred method of communication. Many parents supported transportation and safety investments, but also expressed concerns about how funds are allocated. The survey highlights both community support for key district efforts and significant concerns about academics, spending, and resource equity.
The Englewood Schools EMS and ELA Survey gathered input from 309 parents and staff regarding the future of Englewood Middle School (EMS) and Englewood Leadership Academy (ELA). The survey explored preferences for five possible outcomes: consolidation into a new school, merging one school into the other, continuing the current blended model, separating the schools within the same building, or phasing out one of the schools. The most preferred option throughout the survey was merging EMS and ELA, with EMS being the only school (40%), followed by consolidating the schools into a new school with a new identity (33%). Many respondents supported consolidation or merging because it would improve resource efficiency, reduce operating costs, expand academic programs and extracurricular offerings, and unify the student body under one school identity.
Supporters of the consolidation emphasized eliminating divisions between the two schools and creating a fresh, unified culture. Those preferring to merge into EMS wanted to preserve EMS’s identity while integrating ELA’s rigorous academic offerings. Some respondents advocated maintaining the blended model to keep specialized options for advanced learners while managing costs. Others favored keeping the schools fully separate to preserve choice and maintain small, rigorous learning environments, especially for ELA students. Financial considerations, facility use, and community identity were major factors shaping opinions. There were also calls for greater transparency from the district and concerns about branding, school culture, and ensuring equitable access for all student groups. Throughout the process, the community voiced a desire for decisions that balance cost efficiency, academic quality, student choice, and community cohesion.
The Durango School District 9-R Community Survey collected feedback from 1,784 residents about district performance, financial management, and potential facility improvements. The survey found that 66% of respondents had a favorable opinion of the district, and 71% viewed teachers positively. About 63% approved of the district’s performance educating students, though opinions were split on whether the district had sufficient financial resources. Key concerns among residents included maintaining quality education, ensuring fiscal responsibility, and addressing aging facilities. Survey participants emphasized the importance of attracting high-quality teachers, providing a safe learning environment, and offering a balanced curriculum that includes core subjects, STEM, and career preparation programs.
A proposed $150 million bond measure to address deferred maintenance, aging buildings, and school improvements received strong support. Initially, 72% of respondents indicated they would approve the bond, and this support remained stable after detailed project information was shared. The community demonstrated a high level of interest in replacing outdated facilities, enhancing energy efficiency, and supporting teacher housing to address affordability challenges in the area. While many supported the proposed investments, some residents raised concerns about past financial mismanagement, tax burdens, and the need for more detailed spending plans. Additional themes included prioritizing teacher compensation over new buildings and ensuring transparency and fiscal accountability in all future district projects.
The Thompson School District Post-Election Survey gathered feedback from 1,064 voters regarding their decisions on two 2024 ballot measures: 5A (a mill levy override) and 5B (a bond measure). Both measures were narrowly rejected by voters, with 5A receiving 45% approval and 5B receiving 46% approval. Supporters of 5A emphasized the need to increase teacher and staff compensation, modernize school facilities, and invest in technology to maintain education quality. Opponents mainly cited concerns about high property taxes, vague spending plans, automatic inflation adjustments, and a lack of financial trust in the district. Most voters (80%) found the ballot language for 5A easy to understand, but many still wanted clearer communication on how tax increases would impact them financially.
For 5B, supporters emphasized the importance of improving infrastructure, enhancing safety and security, and preparing for community growth, particularly in areas such as Berthoud. Opponents cited economic pressures, tax fatigue, and a lack of details about how the bond funds would be spent. While 75% of voters found the 5B ballot language understandable, nearly half of the respondents said knowing the specific tax impact on a typical home would have helped them make a more informed decision. Many respondents emphasized the importance of clearer and more transparent communication in future elections. A hypothetical bond measure with no tax increase would likely pass, with 58% indicating support. Voters consistently expressed a desire to support public education, but they also called for improved accountability, efficiency, and more detailed financial planning.
The Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) Enrollment Survey gathered responses from 1,995 parents of children in 5th grade or younger to understand enrollment intentions and awareness of district programs. Among parents of toddlers and infants, 76% planned to enroll their child in a BVSD school, with most intending to use their neighborhood school. However, about one-quarter of these parents were considering open-enrolling in another BVSD school, often seeking specialized programs or smaller class sizes. Across all respondents, 88% of school-aged children were enrolled in BVSD schools, but 37% of those students were open-enrolled at schools outside their neighborhood. The top reasons for choosing neighborhood schools included convenience and belief in the importance of local schools, while parents choosing other BVSD schools often cited family connections, class sizes, and the availability of programs that better met their child’s needs.
Familiarity with BVSD’s academic choice programs varied widely. Parents were most familiar with bilingual Spanish/English, Montessori, and STEAM programs, but awareness of options like Core Knowledge and Gifted and Talented programs was generally low. When asked about their program preferences, parents showed the strongest interest in STEM, Gifted and Talented, and bilingual programs, even if it required a longer commute. Additionally, many parents indicated that potential new programs, like Expeditionary Learning, International Studies, and World Language offerings, would influence their decision to open-enroll their child in another school. Survey findings also revealed that 23% of respondents had children with special educational needs, and most families used personal vehicles or allowed their children to walk or bike to school. Overall, the survey highlighted parents’ desire for program variety, flexible school choices, and strong support for neighborhood schools.
The Cañon City Area Recreation and Park District Ballot Measure Survey gathered responses from 1,027 voters to assess support for funding a new community pool after the closure of the Icabone Pool in 2023. Overall, the recreation district received strong approval, with 83% of voters satisfied with its performance and 65% agreeing that the district is fiscally responsible. When asked about a general tax increase to fund a new pool, 74% of voters supported the idea. The survey tested two funding options: Option A (an outdoor pool with a 0.25% sales tax increase, a 3 mill property tax increase, and debt financing) and Option B (an indoor pool with a 0.30% sales tax increase, a 4 mill property tax increase, and debt financing). Voters consistently favored Option A, with 65% supporting the sales tax increase, 62% supporting the property tax increase, and 63% supporting the debt financing. Option B also had majority support but at slightly lower levels.
Survey participants responded positively to additional information explaining the district’s financial constraints, the history of previous failed pool measures, and the low per capita funding compared to other districts. After learning more, 71-73% of voters reported being more likely to support the measures. Many residents preferred sales taxes over property taxes, believing that a sales tax would distribute costs more fairly across residents and visitors. There was strong community interest in a year-round indoor pool, though some voters expressed concerns about the financial burden, particularly for those on fixed incomes. Respondents emphasized the importance of building a high-quality, long-lasting facility while also suggesting the district consider more modest, affordable options to ensure community support. The survey confirmed broad recognition of the need for updated recreational facilities to serve families and children in the Cañon City area.
The Roaring Fork Fire Rescue Authority Ballot Measure Survey gathered input from 575 voters within the Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District to measure support for a potential bond measure to remodel and expand Fire Station 42 in El Jebel. The survey found broad familiarity with the Authority’s role and strong approval of its services, with 91% of respondents supporting the job the Authority is doing and 68% acknowledging an increase in fire risk in the area. Initially, 68% of voters said they would support the $26 million bond to fund the station’s improvements, which would include new crew quarters, training facilities, vehicle maintenance areas, and employee housing. The survey also found that 61% of respondents believed the Authority was fiscally responsible.
After voters were presented with detailed project information, including benefits such as additional firefighter capacity, improved training facilities, on-site vehicle maintenance, and shared costs with the Snowmass-Wildcat Fire Protection District, support increased. Key messages, such as the possibility of temporarily lowering the mill levy and adding much-needed firefighter housing, made voters more likely to approve the measure, with support rising to 69%. Final concerns centered on cost and tax impact, but the survey demonstrated clear community recognition of the need for the project and a high likelihood of support if the measure were placed on the ballot. Overall, the survey reflected strong trust in the Authority and broad support for investments aimed at enhancing emergency response capabilities.
The Basalt Regional Library District Ballot Measure Survey collected responses from 478 voters to measure support for extending an expiring property tax to maintain and improve library services without increasing the current tax rate. The survey found strong community support for the library, with 88% approving of its performance and 65% believing the district manages taxpayer funds responsibly. Library usage was high, with most respondents visiting the library or utilizing its digital services regularly. Key reasons for non-use included a preference for digital alternatives, time constraints, and a perceived lack of need. Initial support for the proposed ballot measure was strong, with 79% indicating they would approve the extension to fund staff retention, facility maintenance, and expanded programs.
After voters were provided with additional information about the tax’s history, the library’s financial needs, and potential service improvements, support increased to 83%. Many respondents valued the library as a vital community resource and expressed a desire to maintain or expand services such as children’s programs, technology access, online resources, and community meeting spaces. There was broad support for using the funds to improve staff wages to match local living costs. Opponents of the measure primarily cited concerns about high property taxes, frustration with the proposed permanent extension of what was initially a temporary tax, and a desire for more financial transparency. Overall, the survey revealed strong and stable support for preserving the library’s services, as well as a clear understanding of its community role.
The Parker Water and Sanitation District Community Survey collected feedback from 787 adult residents to measure satisfaction with the district’s services, water quality, pricing, and future water supply planning. Overall, 85% of respondents rated service reliability as excellent or good, but fewer (53%) felt they received good value for the cost of services. Water quality received lower ratings, with 64% rating it as excellent or good and 38% reporting recent issues with color or taste. A majority of residents (70%) believed the district could provide long-term water solutions, although awareness of specific plans, such as the Platte Valley Water Partnership, was low. Most residents were familiar with summer watering restrictions, but participation in efficiency programs was limited. Cost concerns were a major theme, with most residents believing a reasonable summer water bill should be under $150 per month.
Support for the district’s goal to secure 75% renewable water was strong (83%), though opinions were divided regarding the costs associated with the Platte Valley Water Partnership. Many residents supported tiered water rates and water budgets for large commercial and HOA properties but were less supportive of water budgets for residential homes. Most respondents disagreed with the notion that water efficiency plans are unnecessary, and 89% agreed that all residents must do their part to preserve the water supply. Open-ended comments revealed major concerns about overdevelopment, rising costs, water quality, and water waste, particularly by commercial properties and HOAs. Residents also expressed the need for better communication, transparency, and long-term infrastructure planning, with several calling for improved conservation programs and more public education on water-related issues.
The Triview Metro District Higby Road Ballot Measure Survey gathered feedback from 387 voters to assess opinions on a potential May 2025 ballot measure to fund the redevelopment of Higby Road without increasing the current tax rate. Initially, 53% of voters supported the measure, which would fund road widening, safety improvements, sidewalks, and roundabouts near Lewis Palmer High School. Support increased to 63% after respondents received more information about the project’s purpose, the district’s reduced property tax rates, and the developer contributions planned to help offset costs. Many residents approved of the Triview Metro District’s performance, with 84% satisfied with its overall services and 81% approving of its road maintenance efforts.
Voters supporting the measure cited safety concerns, growing traffic, the need to improve infrastructure now to avoid future cost increases and trust in Triview’s management. The addition of roundabouts and safer pedestrian access near the high school were seen as significant benefits. Opponents focused on concerns about developers not paying their fair share, opposition to new debt, skepticism about the district’s financial transparency, and frustration with the pace and scale of local development. Some also worried that the cost burden would unfairly fall on residents rather than developers. The survey revealed that, while a majority favors the project, concerns about growth, financial accountability, and long-term planning remain significant factors for voters.
