Garfield County Libraries 2026 Ballot Measure Survey

Magellan Strategies is pleased to present the topline results of a survey of 695 voters in the Garfield County Public Library District. The interviews were conducted from January 20th to 28th, 2026.

Residents of the Garfield County Public Library District reported moderate levels of library usage, with most visiting occasionally and fewer using digital services regularly. Those who did not use the library most often cited reliance on the internet or personal purchases, lack of interest or convenience, or negative perceptions of the library environment. Among users, satisfaction with core services was very high, particularly for library facilities, staff, hours, and access to books and resources, while awareness and satisfaction were lower for specialized services such as job support, language services, and children’s or adult programming.

Overall perceptions of the library district were strongly positive. Large majorities approved of the job the district was doing, with many describing libraries as welcoming, inclusive community hubs that provide valuable services beyond books. Residents frequently highlighted the importance of free access to resources, diverse programming for all ages, and the professionalism and helpfulness of library staff. At the same time, a small but notable share expressed concerns about programming content, the library’s evolving role beyond traditional services, and occasional operational or customer service issues.

Views on financial management were generally favorable but less certain. A majority agreed the district was fiscally responsible, though many were unsure, and opinions were divided on whether the district had sufficient financial resources to provide services. This uncertainty created some tension as voters considered future funding options, particularly in the context of maintaining or extending existing revenue streams.

When presented with a proposed ballot measure to extend an existing property tax mill levy without increasing the tax rate, initial support was strong, with roughly two-thirds indicating they would vote to approve it. The measure was framed as a way to maintain current funding levels for library operations, facilities, staff, and programs, which resonated with many voters who valued continuity and stability in services.

Support increased further as voters received additional information about the measure. Messages explaining that the existing funding was set to expire, that the extension would maintain services without raising taxes, and that funds would support staffing, facilities, and community programs all made large majorities more likely to approve. Information about partnerships with nonprofits to address food insecurity, mental health, and domestic violence, as well as workforce and small business support services, also strengthened support by highlighting the library’s broader community role.

In the final informed ballot test, support rose to a strong majority, with nearly three-quarters indicating they would vote to approve the measure. Supporters most often emphasized the importance of libraries as essential community resources, the value of maintaining services without increasing taxes, and the need to support staff, programs, and community partnerships. These voters viewed the measure as a continuation of a worthwhile investment in community well-being and access to resources.

Opposition centered on concerns about taxation, governance, and the scope of library services. Some voters objected to extending a tax that had originally been presented as temporary, expressed concerns about property tax burdens, or were wary of provisions allowing funds to be collected and spent without limitations. Others questioned whether libraries should be involved in social services or community programs beyond traditional roles, and some raised concerns about transparency and accountability. Overall, the survey showed broad support for maintaining library funding, paired with underlying concerns about tax policy, scope of services, and fiscal oversight.